A world price for carbon: a necessary condition for an effective global climate agreement
In: Harvard international review, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 49
ISSN: 0739-1854
26 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Harvard international review, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 49
ISSN: 0739-1854
In: British journal of political science, Band 26, Heft 2, S. 269-283
ISSN: 0007-1234
World Affairs Online
In: The Parliamentarian: journal of the parliaments of the Commonwealth, Band 77, Heft 3, S. 217-221
ISSN: 0031-2282
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique : RCSP, Band 28, Heft 3, S. 533-551
ISSN: 0008-4239
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique : RCSP, Band 28, Heft 3, S. 533-552
ISSN: 0008-4239
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique : RCSP, Band 28, Heft 3, S. 533-551
ISSN: 0008-4239
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique : RCSP, Band 28, Heft 3, S. 533-551
ISSN: 0008-4239
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 26, Heft 1, S. 38-42
ISSN: 0030-8269, 1049-0965
In: Revue française de science politique, Band 40, Heft 4, S. 501-519
ISSN: 0035-2950
World Affairs Online
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique : RCSP, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 85-101
ISSN: 0008-4239
Because of the manner in which they look at interorganizational conflict & power, no mainstream organizational theories have been able to incorporate the three elements that compose the political dimension in an organization: strategic interaction, integration of behavior in the collective system, & cultural effects. Michel Crozier, collaborating with Erhard Friedberg (L'Acteur et le systeme [The Actor and the System], Paris: Seuil, 1977), claims to have solved this problem by using systematic & hypothetical-inductive reasoning, & by treating power as the basis for all forms of relationship, since there is always a margin of negotiation between actors. Different theoretical positions regarding Crozier's strategic analysis are examined. The advantages of his procedure are stressed & an improvement is suggested that facilitates the understanding of interaction. The assumption of the necessity of systematic integration is questioned, & the methodological difficulties of introducing the cultural element in strategic action are discussed. Modified HA.
In: International review of administrative sciences: an international journal of comparative public administration, Band 56, Heft 1, S. 149
ISSN: 0020-8523
In: Polity: the journal of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 655
ISSN: 0032-3497
In: Revue française de science politique, Band 37, Heft 1, S. 76-97
ISSN: 0035-2950
World Affairs Online
In: Canadian public policy: Analyse de politiques, Band 26, Heft 3, S. 390
ISSN: 1911-9917